Urban Cycling 101 : Rules of the Road

I bike to work every day, regardless of weather, time constraints, how I'm feeling (for the most part) or anything else. If I'm going to work, I'm getting there on my bike. There are a few dedicated trails that I can take, particularly the Lakefront trail, but these are often congested with inexperienced and slower riders, and it's difficult for me to get a good ride in on these trails. So I ride the city streets, right along side traffic.

To the uninitiated or unskilled, cycling in heavily trafficked city streets at high speeds just feet from cars & trucks can be intimidating at least -- if you don't know what you're doing, it can also be very dangerous. Like everything else in life however, urban cycling is a skill that can be learned -- I maintain that anyone can learn it, it's not rocket science. Many of the skills you learn are simply based in common sense. Others may seem counter-intuitive. To give you an idea what's involved in my daily commute and how I've managed to remain out of trouble for the last 12,000 miles (knock on wood) I decided to write some rules of the road. Here we go...

Rule #1 : In Car vs Bike, the Bike Always Loses

This seems obvious, and it should be. But I see people on bikes doing crazy and stupid things all the time thinking that they won't be hurt. Things like rolling stop signs and red lights. Riding inches from the curb and weaving around obstacles in the roadway. Blocking the right side of a traffic lane. It doesn't take much to knock a cyclist off his ride, and when that happens things tend to break. So this rule is the foundation of all others.

All it takes to get hurt is for a vehicle to brush up against you. Or open their door in your path. Or turn in front of you, forcing you to take evasive action and change course in to a more dangerous area. So the key to being safe when riding among cars is making sure you're never in a Car vs Bike contest. There are several ways to accomplish this.

First, always be completely aware of your surroundings. This means not just what's up ahead of you, but also what's coming up from behind and from the sides. Most of the danger in the streets is in places where you can't see -- behind you, around blind corners, over the crest of a hill, on the other sides of buildings.

Second, always make everyone around you completely aware of your presence. If a motorist knows where you are and what you are doing, they won't hit you. People are not all axe murderers. Many may dislike cyclists, but they won't purposely strike you. So it logically follows that when cyclists get hit, it's because the motorist wasn't aware of where they were and what they were doing.

In making everyone around you aware of your presence, you have to be assertive. Do not hug the curb. If you are inches away from a curb, you are in the motorist's peripheral vision and he will regard you as a pedestrian. He will give you almost no conscious consideration. This is bad! You need every motorist to have a conscious thought about your presence, "There's a bike on the right." So get away from that curb, and get in to the motorist's direct line of sight.

If you are on a street with a dedicated bike lane, use the bike lane intelligently. Get off of the right-hand stripe. Don't be afraid of being close to traffic. If you picked the right street and you are in motorists' direct line of sight, you'll be safer than if you're a wallflower in the door zone. I usually ride 2 inches to the right of the left-hand stripe. This forces motorists to see me, but it keeps me out of the car lane. It also gives me plenty of space on the right if I need to execute an emergency maneuver.

Some streets have shared bike lanes. There is no left-hand solid stripe in the road in these cases. In these cases, pretend there is a stripe. Ride as close to the left-hand imaginary stripe as possible to stay out of the door zone and off cars' right panels.

In many cases on roads with or without any kind of bike lane, the roadway can become constricted. Either because of parked cars, construction, whatever. Sometimes there is just enough space for a car, but no bike. You have to be aware of situations where it would be dangerous to allow a motorist to pass you in these constricted areas. I have a 3-foot rule. If there is not enough room on the roadway for me to have 3 feet of space on both sides of me if someone passes me, then there's not enough room for both me and a car. In these cases, you must take the entire lane. That means moving in to the exact center of the lane, blocking all traffic behind you from passing you until you clear the obstruction. Usually these obstructions will only last 20 feet or so. When taking the lane, accelerate as hard as possible, giving 100% effort. Do not piss off drivers behind you any more who may already be annoyed by traffic, having a bad day, cold coffee, whatever. When taking the lane, first look behind you. This gives you an idea what's happening back there, but it also gives people behind you a signal that you're about to change course. Move to the center gradually, with plenty of lead time. Usually I start manuvering to the center of the lane about 7 seconds before I get to the obstruction. As soon as you pass the obstruction, immediately get back in to the bike lane as quickly as you can safely.

People often think that taking the lane is dangerous and reckless, but it's not. Trying to make yourself skinny and squeeze through a tight space is far more dangerous. Going through a construction area in an attempt to avoid the constricted roadway is just stupid. And hopping the curb and hitting the sidewalk is dangerous for you, dangerous for pedestrians you can't see, and dangerous for you again when you try to merge back in to the traffic lane.

Next up, I'll discuss some cycling skills everyone should have.

slavery, racism, and privilege today

I watched a show on PBS the other night, a documentary called 'Traces of the Trade: A Story from the Deep North'. It was about a woman from Rhode Island, Katrina Browne, who found out that her family's ancestors were the largest slave traders in US history.
Wow. Can you even imagine what would it be like to find that out?
She said that when she was in college, she received a little book that her grandmother had written for all of the grandchildren, a sort of genealogy of the family, and this was the first time this history had been spoken of. She decided to contact as many of her relatives from this line, the De Wolfs, as she could, so they could explore this history and what it meant for their family and themselves.
A little DeWolf history: They have been a prominent family in the town of Bristol, Rhode Island, and even today the family is highly regarded by the residents. One of the ancestors was a Congressman, and the family became very rich from the slave trade. They used their fortune to start other businesses, such as factories. Three generations of DeWolfs were slave traders, from the mid 1700's to the mid 1800's - this means that for much of this time, slave trading was illegal as well as immoral.
The woman who did this documentary, Katrina, got 9 of her relatives together for a trip along the 'Triangle Trade' route, the slave trading route that went from Rhode Island, to Ghana, to Havana, Cuba, and back to New England. These people are from all over the country now, and most had never met before, but have this family connection. (Katrina is from Philadelphia. One guy, Thomas DeWolf, lives in Oregon...) They flew to all these places, and visited locations that were part of the ancestor's 'slave trading empire' so to speak. A 'castle' on the Ghanaian coast, which is really a prison where the 'captured' (purchased) Africans were kept until they had enough to fill the ship. A cane sugar plantation in Cuba, one of 3 that were owned by another ancestor, where sugar and molasses was made - by slaves- which was then shipped to New England to be sold to make rum, which was used to pay for the captured Africans, and around and around.
These people consider themselves 'good protestants', Episcopalians, actually, and were very moved and upset by this trip. They felt very bad about what their ancestors did, and did not understand how, for three generations, people could bring themselves to do such awful things. Seems like a perfectly normal reaction, one that most people would have. They spent a good deal of time talking about how they felt, and what they were seeing, and eventually they started talking about what they thought, if anything, they should do.
What really got me thinking was when she discussed how the town held this family in high esteem, even now. After the last DeWolf slave trader died, in the late 1800's, the town brought the guy's carriage out every year for the 4th of July parade, even into the 1930's. And yet, one of the historians the family talked to described how the whole town would have been involved in this 'business', from the ship builders, to the investors, to the rum makers, to the factory up the road, built from slave money. Everyone must have known about this, and they certainly profited from this horrible trade, and the town to this day is well off, as is much of the region.
After the trip, the family members spent an evening around a dinner table, talking about how the meal that they were eating, after the trip they had taken, made them feel privileged, especially because they did not consider themselves of a privileged status, gained through their family connection.
But then they started thinking about how they are privileged. One man said that he worked very hard all through school, to be able to go to Harvard, and that it was not privilege. Yet, when they went around the table, every person had gone to an Ivy League school - Harvard, Princeton, Brown. Many, third generation. They began to realize that this status is a direct result of the slave trade. Well, they didn't really say that, but they should have. Because most white people in this country, including myself, gain something from being white. Even though I am not rich, I certainly have had certain advantages in life that people of color do not have. I got a good education, I grew up in a good town, I have access to things like healthy food and lots of books that many do not have. And I have other relatives who have good jobs, connections, whatever. Now, whatever you think about status and class in this country, you have to admit that the surest way to get ahead is to get a good education, and to have the right opportunities available to you at the right time.
But what really got me thinking was the idea that in this country, we have created this situation that has placed a certain group - mainly comprised of white people of European descent- in a class that is above others because of everything they have, and have available to them, and that they got there through the mistreatment of others. They personally may not have done the mistreating, but historically, that mistreatment has placed the mis treaters and their descendants in a privileged position. The mistreated have been of many ethnicities, African among them, and it does on various levels continue to this day. If you think about all the things that we have to pay for to live a decent life in this country, you must start to realize that having a permanent lower class -which I consider mistreatment - perpetuates racism. Our society builds public housing complexes, which only the very poorest live in, and there is almost no way out of. We charge for schooling, we build cities that require cars, our public transit systems -when they exist at all - cost money to use, we don't have a safety net such as free housing and free health care, there is no state-mandated retirement system, we have no support system for members of society who cannot fend for themselves.
Most people probably would look at that list and think, "well, this is a Capitalist world, so of course all that stuff does cost money to have!" I totally disagree, and I am not alone. There are whole continents (see Europe) that do just fine providing for their citizens, regardless of their situation. They have found a way to equalize the field, and they have done it because it is the right thing to do. Discussing capitalism, however, is a topic for another post, so I will leave it there for now. (Besides, Jen could probably bemoan the evils of capitalism much better, or at least much more technically than I ever could!)
In the end, this program really made me think about racism in this country, and how truly built in it is. Eliminating it is more complex than simply convincing people not to be racist, or even waiting for the mindset to die out. We can't create laws that will eliminate racism - we can only hope they counteract the effects of racism. And we, as the descendants of privileged European-descended white folks who started this thing, need to realize that having the mindset of 'I earned what I have', which is followed with 'they also should earn what they get', is the root of the problem. Greed, I believe it is called.
Tch, tch.

Boutiqued!

(Kathleen asked me to cross-post this so that people who don't have access to the private blog can see it too.)

In the MGM Grand casino in Las Vegas, there's this vending machine that sells electronics. I mean stuff like iPods and high-end earphones. I bought my new camera there, but needed additional memory to make my vlogs. So I went back and got some more brain pan!

I made a kewl vid of the experience. Here tis. Enjoy!

Hmm...

Just a few short days after my missive about the nature of Happiness, look what Steve Chapman and Mary Schmich are suddenly talking about in the Tribune. Coincidence? I think not...

WSOP Vlog, July 3 2008

I've been sending Kathleen Video Blogs every day during my trip to Vegas. This time I thought I'd post it here instead! So don't be surprised when I address the camera as 'Sugar Pop!'

Enjoy!

Greetings From Las Vegas!